


Please make Banterist your one-stop source for potentially obscure, Harry Potter, Star Trek and Moonraker-related political humor.
You can ping this entry by using:
http://www.banterist.com/movabletype/mt-tb.cgi/550
Definitely not for everybody, but certainly for somebody.




Banterist is licensed under a Creative Commons License and is powered by Movable Type 3.33. The site is pretty because Nick Aster made it that way.
© 2003-2008 Brian Sack. All rights reserved.
Where've
we been?
NPR • The
Guardian • USA
Today • Boing Boing • Daybreak USA • Fusion • New York
Daily News • Canada National Post • KIRO • Radar • McSweeney's • The
Independent • Glamour • MSNBC.com • FARK • Glenn Beck program • New York
Post Page Six • BBC Radio • Gawker • Defamer
• CNN.com • Cracked • New
Zealand Herald • Irish
Independent • Weekend America and other fine media outlets.
Comments
Banterist is my one-stop source for potentially obscure, Harry Potter, Star Trek and Moonraker-related political humor.
But, what about P.F. Chang's? Can we not believe in that Chang? Or, would it just not be humorous? Or, would it be too obscure? Or, not obscure enough?
[ Sadly it was under consideration. -B. ]
Posted by: Alexander | March 26, 2008 11:39 AM
What a fantastic time saver. It used to take me hours to find Chang references by scouring the web over.
Hey, I say good call on the PF Chang omission, that is NOT a Chang I can believe in. I have always been unsettled by the heart-shaped anuses on Chang's horses? Have you noticed? Those must be a veritable pla-dough crap factories.
Chang (P.F. that is) is one sick mofo.
Posted by: Kerry | March 26, 2008 3:07 PM
Awesome. I just submitted you to Digg, so you're blog may get pretty popular here soon!
Posted by: Ross | March 27, 2008 3:14 PM
Your a great guy, Ross.
Dugg.
Posted by: Kevin | March 27, 2008 5:03 PM
I like this way too much. Would you mind if I re-published it on www.terry.ubc.ca? I believe we did it before with your Nigerian Email Experiment.
Posted by: Vivian | March 30, 2008 12:22 AM
The point is, ladies and gentleman, that Chang -- for lack of a better word -- is good.
Chang is right.
Chang works.
Chang clarifies, cuts through, and captures the essence of the evolutionary spirit.
Chang, in all of its forms has marked the upward surge of mankind.
Thank you for an excellent post! Made my day :)
Posted by: Chuck | April 1, 2008 3:52 PM