
Complaint: Misdemeanor apostrophe negligence; affixing faulty apostrophe to glass surface.
Defendant: Janovic Paints
Report: During execution of window-dressing campaign designed to look like it was done by amateurs, a superfluous apostrophe was placed in the possessive "its" turning it into an "it is" or "it has." This made no sense and troubled the officer terribly.
Fine: $85 & 1 gallon Benjamin Moore semi-gloss base coat.
You can ping this entry by using:
http://www.banterist.com/movabletype/mt-tb.cgi/93
Follow us on Twitter @brian_sack



Banterist is licensed under a Creative Commons License and is powered by Movable Type 4.32-en. The site is pretty because Nick Aster made it that way.
© 2003-2010 Brian Sack. All rights reserved.
Where've
we been?
The New York Times • NPR • WBCN • Mancow • Fox & Friends • CBS Up To The Minute • The Jay Thomas Show • WJIM • WOCM • CW 11 • The
Guardian • USA
Today • Boing Boing • Daybreak USA • Fusion • New York
Daily News • Canada National Post • KIRO • Radar • McSweeney's • The
Independent • Glamour • MSNBC.com • FARK • Glenn Beck program • New York
Post Page Six • BBC Radio • Gawker • Defamer
• CNN.com • Cracked • New
Zealand Herald • Irish
Independent • Weekend America and other fine media outlets.
Comments
the officer needs grammar lessons.
the apostrophe is a magical thing. it makes things possessive or contractions. in this case, "it's" is possessive.
Posted by: pak | January 23, 2004 4:45 PM
No Pak, the officer doesn't need them. Apostrophes are not used with posessive pronouns (its, his, hers). Your fine is $45 plus $50 for misdemeanor smugness and a written warning on capital offenses.
Posted by: Brian | January 23, 2004 5:20 PM
The magical aposthrophe? I don't remember that from "School House Rock".
Don't mess with grammar cop.
P.S. I really hope my use of quotation marks doesn't warrant a fine.
Or my spelling of warrant.
Posted by: Scott Biear | January 24, 2004 9:46 PM
"Warrant" is fine, but "aposthrope" sounds like something Moliere wrote.
Posted by: Brian | January 26, 2004 1:47 PM
How about the fact that they should have said, "We feel THAT our product stands..." I sincerely regret that I will not be able read your highly amusing commentary on how disturbing it is that they "feel their product". I might even check back later to see if you've added something particularly pithy.
Posted by: Troye | August 12, 2004 3:43 PM
an expletive "that" is removable. However, it is usually reccomended that it be left alone in more formal writing.
Posted by: Altyre | November 10, 2004 7:41 PM
No, it is not usually "reccomended." It is usually "recommended," as in, "it is usually recommended that if you must correct, correct correctly."
Posted by: Ratballs | May 10, 2005 1:58 PM